Author of Disgusting Kirk Poem Apologizes

November 1, 2026

UTSA sign on a building corner against a clear sky — Photo: University of College / Shutterstock

A UTSA student who went viral for mocking Charlie Kirk’s assassination has now apologized directly to his family and the event host.

Story Highlights

Isa Casahuga issued a direct apology to Erika Kirk, the Kirk family, and Christian Collins.
UTSA confirmed a student-conduct review after the poem referenced Kirk’s fatal neck wound.
Christian Collins said the remark about appearing without neck protection felt personally threatening.
University leaders said they would not tolerate incitement or threats across the UT System.

What Casahuga Said in Her Apology

Isa Casahuga posted a video apologizing to the people most affected. She addressed Erika Kirk, the Kirk children, and the wider family by name. She also apologized to Christian Collins, the host of the campus event where she read the poem. She called her words “beyond inappropriate and hurtful,” and “deeply insensitive” given the family’s loss. The report that quotes the video does not include a full transcript, so the exact language condemning political violence is not fully documented in the sources available.

Casahuga’s apology follows days of backlash and intense online attention. The event occurred at the University of Texas at San Antonio on September 23, 2026, according to reports, and clips spread quickly. The poem referenced a shot to the neck, aligning with how Charlie Kirk was killed. The apology acknowledges harm but does not outline next steps, such as meetings with those affected, restorative actions, or campus programming participation, based on the present record.

How the Incident Unfolded on Campus

UTSA confirmed that it opened a student-conduct review after the video spread. The reporting describes the poem’s reference to Kirk’s fatal injury and a remark to Christian Collins about appearing without neck protection. The University of Texas System leaders said the institution would not tolerate incitement of violence, threats, or threats of incitement. UTSA also said the student’s sentiments did not reflect the school’s values. The university declined to discuss any specific sanctions, citing privacy rules.

Christian Collins, who hosted the “Pick Up the Mic” event, shared his account on social media. He said the student read a poem that celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination “with such glee,” then told him he was “brave” for being on campus without his neck covered. Collins said he told the student he would pray for her. His post helped frame the episode as part of a hostile climate for conservative speakers on campuses today.

Why This Matters Beyond One Viral Clip

This episode highlights a recurring tension at public universities. These schools must allow even harsh political speech under the First Amendment. They also must act when speech crosses into true threats or incitement to imminent lawless action. Courts have held that offensive or upsetting speech is generally protected, while targeted threats and incitement are not. That line is hard to draw in fast, tense events and even harder in edited viral clips.

UTSA student Isa Casahuga who gleefully mocked Charlie Kirk’s assassination with a “sh*t to the neck” “Kirkiversary” poem is now scrambling to apologize to Erika Kirk and her family after massive public backlash.

"My words were deeply insensitive, to say the least, particularly… pic.twitter.com/dUEOMYlLsR

— Christina Aguayo (@ChristinaNewstv) November 1, 2026

The broader concern cuts across politics. Many people see a system that reacts only when public outrage builds, not when values are at stake. Supporters of speech rights worry that universities punish speech they dislike. Others say institutions ignore targeted harassment until a headline forces action. In this case, UT leaders condemned incitement, while the student apologized. The public still lacks a final, transparent outcome from the campus review or a response from the Kirk family.

What to Watch Next

Watch for several next steps. First, UTSA’s conduct process could produce a public, policy-level explanation, even if records on individuals stay private. Second, the full apology video and a transcript could clarify whether Casahuga explicitly condemned political violence and how she views accountability now. Third, any response from the Kirk family or Christian Collins could signal whether reconciliation is possible. Finally, this case will likely feed national fights over campus speech, threats, and consistent rules.