The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided that mail-in ballots with errors such as missing or incorrect dates will be rejected, marking a significant advancement in mail-in voting security. The decision is praised by Republicans, although it faces opposition from some leftist groups.
Republicans see the ruling as a crucial step in combating fraud. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley described it as a “HUGE win in Pennsylvania.” He noted that the ruling, resulting from the efforts of the RNC and the Pennsylvania Republican Party, will enhance the security of mail-in voting.
“This makes mail voting in the Keystone State less susceptible to fraud. We will keep fighting and winning!” Whatley stated.
In contrast, leftist groups like the Pennsylvania ACLU argue that the decision could disenfranchise voters. Steve Loney, a senior attorney with the ACLU, criticized the ruling, saying, “Today’s procedural ruling is a setback for Pennsylvania voters, but we will keep fighting for them.” He contends that minor errors should not result in the rejection of ballots.
The ruling follows the primary election where around 4,400 mail-in ballots were rejected due to dating issues, highlighting the importance of the Supreme Court’s decision in preventing similar issues in the upcoming general election.
The court’s decision is seen as a key measure in securing the mail-in voting process and addressing potential fraud risks.
