Joe Scarborough, MSNBC host, faced criticism for his enthusiastic defense of President Joe Biden. Media ethics expert Dr. Dan Axelrod stated that Scarborough sounded “more like a publicist than a journalist” when praising Biden’s intellect and analytical abilities in March.
Axelrod emphasized the importance of journalistic ethics, suggesting Scarborough failed to adhere to guidelines like seeking truth and avoiding favoritism.
Scarborough’s March 6 defense of Biden included a strong declaration of Biden’s fitness, saying this version of Biden was “the best Biden ever.” However, after Biden’s poor debate performance, Scarborough suggested Biden consider stepping down.
Days later, Biden appeared on Scarborough’s show, sparking further scrutiny. Axelrod highlighted the need for transparency, accountability, and independence in journalism, areas where he feels Scarborough’s coverage fell short.
The close relationship between the Morning Joe show and the Biden administration, including family ties through co-host Mika Brzezinski, raises further ethical concerns.
Ethical codes require journalists to disclose potential conflicts of interest, which critics argue Scarborough and Brzezinski have not adequately done.
MSNBC has yet to comment, but the controversy over Biden’s mental fitness and Scarborough’s defense is expected to continue.