The CIA’s recent embrace of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in its promotion and hiring practices is drawing criticism from former intelligence officials, who warn that these initiatives could compromise the agency’s focus on national security. According to internal documents, the CIA has adopted DEI as a foundational element, which some believe risks shifting attention away from mission-critical operations.
Jerry Laurienti, the agency’s Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, outlined the CIA’s DEI strategy during a recent presentation, noting that DEI is a required consideration in promotions. Laurienti explained that candidates are now evaluated on their commitment to fostering inclusive environments within their teams, a criterion he said is as important as mission performance.
Internal slides reveal the CIA’s goal to make these DEI initiatives resilient to political changes, with staff feedback emphasizing a desire for programs that last “despite changes in leadership.” Critics argue that cementing DEI as a permanent feature could result in a workforce more focused on social objectives than intelligence gathering.
Fred Fleitz, a former CIA official, cautioned that this approach could weaken the agency’s mission readiness. He argued that DEI requirements might lead to promoting individuals based on factors other than merit, thereby reducing the CIA’s ability to recruit the best talent. Fleitz described this as “diverting resources” from intelligence work, adding that America’s adversaries could benefit from a distracted CIA.
Beyond promotions, the CIA’s DEI strategy aims to create “psychological safety” and reduce barriers for underrepresented groups. While supporters claim these changes foster a supportive environment, critics worry they may lower standards and divert attention from the CIA’s core mission.
The CIA’s focus on DEI reflects a growing trend in government institutions, but its implementation at an intelligence agency has sparked an intense debate. As the agency works to balance DEI with security priorities, some fear the impact on its national security role.
